Clinical Data
FEA: Sacropelvic Hardware on Axis & Center of Rotation of the SI Joint (Panico - Int J Spine Surg 2023)
Effect of Sacropelvic Hardware on Axis and Center of Rotation of the Sacroiliac Joint: A Finite Element Study.
Panico M, Chande RD, Polly DW, Lindsey DP, Villa TMT, Yerby SA, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F.
Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):122-131. [Epub 2022 Dec 27]
DOI: 10.14444/8387. PMID: 36574987. PMCID: PMC10025848.
ABSTRACT
Background: The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) transfers the load of the upper body to the lower extremities while allowing a variable physiological movement among individuals. The axis of rotation (AoR) and center of rotation (CoR) of the SIJ can be evaluated to analyze the stability of the SIJ, including when the sacrum is fixed. The purpose of this study was to determine how load intensity affects the SIJ for the intact model and to characterize how sacropelvic fixation performed with different techniques affects this joint.
Methods: Five T10-pelvis models were used: (1) intact model; (2) pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1; (3)pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1, and bilateral S2 alar-iliac screws (S2AI); (4) pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1, bilateral S2AI screws, and triangular implants inserted bilaterally in a sacral alar-iliac trajectory ; and (5) pedicle screws and rods in T10-S1, bilateral S2AI screws, and 2 bilateral triangular implants inserted in a lateral trajectory. Outputs of these models under flexion-extension were compared: AoR and CoR of the SIJ at incremental steps from 0 to 7.5 Nm for the intact model and AoR and CoR of the SIJ for the instrumented models at 7.5 Nm.
Results: The intact model was validated against an in vivo study by comparing range of motion and displacement of the sacrum. Increasing the load intensity for the intact model led to an increase of the rotation of the sacrum but did not change the CoR. Comparison among the instrumented models showed that sacropelvic fixation techniques reduced the rotation of the sacrum and stabilized the SIJ, in particular with triangular implants.
Conclusion: The study outcomes suggest that increasing load intensity increases the rotation of the sacrum but does not influence the CoR, and use of sacropelvic fixation increases the stability of the SIJ, especially when triangular implants are employed.
Clinical relevance: The choice of the instrumentation strategy for sacropelvic fixation affects the stability of the construct in terms of both range of motion and axes of rotation, with direct consequences on the risk of failure and mobilization. Clinical studies should be performed to confirm these biomechanical findings.
KEYWORDS: S2 alar-iliac screws; sacropelvic fixation; triangular implants.
Author Information
- Panico M - IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Chande RD - SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
- Polly DW - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
- Lindsey DP - SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
- Villa TMT - IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. Department of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering, "Giulio Natta", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
- Yerby SA - SI-BONE, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
- Brayda-Burno M - IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
- Galbusera F - Spine Center, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.