iFuse Published, Peer-Reviewed Articles
Available since 2009, iFuse is the only SI joint fusion device with published results from randomized controlled trials and the only one with multiple prospective clinical studies that show iFuse improved pain, patient function, and quality of life.
Comparison (Level III)
Complications in SI Joint Fusion (Rahl - Clin Spine Surg 2022)
Analysis of Complications in Sacroiliac Joint Fusions Using FDA 510(k) Cleared Devices
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Rialto (Claus - World Neurosurg 2019)
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
Lumbar Fusions in Patients Denied SI Joint Fusion (Vanaclocha - Br J Neurosurg 2018)
High Frequency of Lumbar Fusionin Patients Denied Surgical Treatment of the Sacroiliac Joint
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
6-year Comparison, CM vs RF vs iFuse (Vanaclocha - Neurosurgery 2017)
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
4-year Revision, iFuse vs. Screws (Spain - IJSS 2017)
Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Ledonio - MDER 2014)
Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Ledonio - CORR 2014)
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion - Are They Similarly Safe and Effective?
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Smith - ASIR 2013)
Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Multi-center Comparison
VIEW DATA