iFuse Technology® Peer-Reviewed Articles
Over one hundred peer-reviewed publications report on the clinical outcomes, safety, technique, biomechanics, economics, and use of SI-BONE products with iFuse Technology®.
Comparison (Level III)
MIS SI Joint Fusion Implant Comparison (Splitt - Z Orthop Unfall 2024)
Surgical Treatment of Patients with Sacroiliac Joint Syndrome: Comparative Study of Two Implants.
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
MIS SI Joint Fusion, 113 patients - 40 with HA screws, 73 with triangular implants (Agarwal - World Neurosurg 2024)
Hydroxyapatite-Coated Screws Versus Titanium Triangular Dowels for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Results From a Nonrandomized Prospective Outcomes Study
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Rialto (Claus - World Neurosurg 2019)
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Using Triangular Titanium versus Cylindrical Threaded Implants: A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
Lumbar Fusions in Patients Denied SI Joint Fusion (Vanaclocha - Br J Neurosurg 2018)
High Frequency of Lumbar Fusionin Patients Denied Surgical Treatment of the Sacroiliac Joint
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
6-year Comparison, CM vs RF vs iFuse (Vanaclocha - Neurosurgery 2017)
Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
4-year Revision, iFuse vs. Screws (Spain - IJSS 2017)
Surgical Revision after Sacroiliac Joint Fixation or Fusion
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Ledonio - MDER 2014)
Comparative Effectiveness of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Ledonio - CORR 2014)
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion - Are They Similarly Safe and Effective?
VIEW DATAComparison (Level III)
iFuse vs. Open (Smith - ASIR 2013)
Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Multi-center Comparison
VIEW DATA