FEA Comparison of Three Sacropelvic Fixations | SI-BONE
Is It SI? SI-BONE releases TV commercial about minimally invasive iFuse Procedure. WATCH NOW

Clinical Data

Biomechanical Effects of iFuse with Long-Construct (de Andrada Pereira - J Neurosurg Spine 2021)

Biomechanical Effects of A Novel Posteriorly Placed Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Device Integrated with Traditional Lumbopelvic Long-construct Instrumentation

de Andrada Pereira B, Lehrman JN, Sawa AGU, Lindsey DP, Yerby SA, Godzik J, Waguespack AM, Uribe JS, Kelly BP.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Jun 18:1-10. [Epub ahead of print]
DOI: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201540

ABSTRACT

Objective: S2-alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation effectively ensures stability and enhances fusion in long-segment constructs. Nevertheless, pelvic fixation is associated with a high rate of mechanical failure. Because of the transarticular nature of the S2AI screw, adding a second point of fixation may provide additional stability and attenuate strains. The objective of the study was to evaluate changes in stability and strain with the integration of a sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion device, implanted through a novel posterior SI approach, supplemental to posterior long-segment fusion.

Methods: L1-pelvis human cadaveric specimens underwent pure moment (7.5 Nm) and compression (400 N) tests in the following conditions: 1) intact, 2) L2-S1 pedicle screw and rod fixation with L5-S1 interbody fusion, 3) added S2AI screws, and 4) added bilateral SI joint fixation (SIJF). The range of motion (ROM), rod strain, and screw bending moments (S1 and S2AI) were analyzed.

Results
: S2AI fixation decreased L2-S1 ROM in flexion-extension (p ≤ 0.04), L5-S1 ROM in flexion-extension and compression (p ≤ 0.004), and SI joint ROM during flexion-extension and lateral bending (p ≤ 0.03) compared with S1 fixation. SI joint ROM was significantly less with SIJF in place than with the intact joint, S1, and S2AI fixation in flexion-extension and lateral bending (p ≤ 0.01). The S1 screw bending moment decreased following S2AI fixation by as much as 78% in extension, but with statistical significance only in right axial rotation (p = 0.03). Extending fixation to S2AI significantly increased the rod strain at L5-S1 during flexion, axial rotation, and compression (p ≤ 0.048). SIJF was associated with a slight increase in rod strain versus S2AI fixation alone at L5-S1 during left lateral bending (p = 0.048). Compared with the S1 condition, fixation to S2AI increased the mean rod strain at L5-S1 during compression (p = 0.048). The rod strain at L5-S1 was not statistically different with SIJF compared with S2AI fixation (p ≥ 0.12).

Conclusions
: Constructs ending with an S2AI screw versus an S1 screw tended to be more stable, with reduced SI joint motion. S2AI fixation decreased the S1 screw bending moments compared with fixation ending at S1. These benefits were paired with increased rod strain at L5-S1. Supplementation of S2AI fixation with SIJF implants provided further reductions (approximately 30%) in the sagittal plane and lateral bending SI joint motion compared with fixation ending at the S2AI position. This stability was not paired with significant changes in rod or screw strains.

KEYWORDS
: S2AI; SI joint; iFuse; iliac fixation; rod strain; sacral; sacropelvic fixation.

Author Information

de Andrada Pereira B, Lehrman JN, Sawa AGU, Kelly BP - Department of Neurosurgery, Spinal Biomechanics Laboratory

Lindsey D, Yerby S - SI-BONE, Inc, San Jose, CA, USA.

Godzik J, Uribe JS - Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona.

Waguespack AM - SpineCare Medical Group, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Looking for Answers?

We can help. Tell us what you're looking for below.